| Listing Status |
| Endangered Species Act (?) |
| Status: Not listed |
|
| Migratory Bird Treaty Act (?) |
| Status: Protected |
|
| California Endangered Species Act (?) |
| Status: Not listed |
|
| California Natural Diversity
Database (?) |
| G5S3 |
|
| World Conservation Union (IUCN)
(?) |
| Status: Not listed |
|
| U.S. Bird Conservation
(?) |
| Status: Not listed |
|
| The Audobon Society Watchlist
(?) |
| Status: Not listed |
|
| Convention of International
Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) (?) |
| Status: Not listed |
|
| Geographic Range |
| General: |
The Rhinoceros
Auklet (Cirorhinca monocerata) breeds throughout the northern Pacific
Rim, from central California north and west to northern Japan (Figure
1). During the non-breeding season in the eastern Pacific, the range
shifts to the south – with most individuals occurring between
Vancouver Island, B.C. and southern California. Small numbers are
regularly encountered between San Diego and central Baja California
(Figure 1).
In California, three islands provide most of the nesting habitat:
Castle Rock National Wildlife Refuge (Del Norte County), South Farallon
Islands (San Francisco County), and Año Nuevo Island (San
Mateo County) (Figure 2). Nesting has occurred or been suspected
to occur at a number of other locations in California including:
Prince Island (Del Norte County), Green Rock and Little River Rock
(Humboldt County), Fish Rocks and Gualala Point Island (Mendocino
County), Arched Rock (Sonoma County), Point Reyes (Marin County),
Pt. Arguello (Santa Barbara County), and San Miguel/Prince Islands
(Channel Islands).1,2,3,4,5
At many of these locations, nesting has been suspected because birds
in breeding plumage are sighted on the water or carrying fish in
the area.
|
| MBNMS: |
The only large
nesting colony in the MBNMS is located at Año Nuevo
Island (Figure 3). However, a large breeding colony on
the South Farallon
Islands is located just to the north of the MBNMS, in the Gulf
of the Farallones NMS. Nesting behavior has been observed
sporadically
at a few mainland cliffs in Santa Cruz County.2
When at-sea, this species can be seen in waters throughout the
longitudinal extent of the Sanctuary, but it is less frequently
observed in the
southern portion (Figure 3).6 |

Figure 1. Summer (orange), winter (blue) and year-round (green) distribution
of Rhinoceros Auklets off North America.(from http://identify.whatbird.com/obj/262/_/Rhinoceros_Auklet.aspx
)
Download full-size
figures (192 KB PDF). |

Figure 2. Location of the three main breeding colonies of the Rhinoceros
Auklet in California (from http://www.prbo.org/cms/images/marine/anobath.jpg).
Download full-size
figures (192 KB PDF). |

Figure 3. Density (birds/km2) of Rhinoceros Auklet in the
Monterey Bay, Gulf of the Farallones, and Cordell Bank National Marine
Sanctuaries during (a) Upwelling season, (b) Oceanic season, (c) Davidson
Current season, and (d) all seasons combined. Location and size of
breeding colonies is also shown.6
Download full-size
figures (192 KB PDF). |
|
[ Top of page ]
| Habitat |
| General: |
Rhinoceros Auklets are pelagic
birds that only come ashore for breeding-related activities. They
are most common beyond the shelf break in either slope (200-2000m)
or deep water habitats (>2000m), but they may be found in significant
concentrations over the continental shelf in areas adjacent to submarine
canyons and other deep water features.7
Nesting usually occurs on offshore rocks and islands. Nesting locations
often have grass, shrubs or trees, with enough soil for the birds
to dig a burrow (e.g., Año Nuevo Island – though loss
of vegetation and erosion are a problem at this location). In rocky
habitats with little or no topsoil, nests can also occur in deep
cracks, crevices, or caves. Nests are typically located on slopes
from which the birds can take flight easily. Less commonly, nests
may be located on mainland cliffs that are protected from predators.
|
| MBNMS: |
In the Sanctuary,
this species forages along the shelf break and upper continental
slope and over the Monterey submarine canyon.6,8
When associated with nesting colonies during the breeding season,
this species occurs in shallower water (mean depth of 791 m) than
during the post-nesting season (mean depth 1,370 m).6
Post-nesting this species is known to disperse widely. At Año
Nuevo Island, Rhinoceros Auklets nest either in soil burrows or
in artificial nest boxes.5
|
|
[ Top of page ]
| Migration and Movements |
| General: |
Rhinoceros Auklets are present
in waters off California year-round (Figure 3). They are found in
low abundance during the breeding season (early April to early September)
and then numbers increase dramatically during the fall due to the
influx of hundreds of thousands of migrants from breeding colonies
off Alaska and British Columbia, Canada (Figure 3).7
Birds breeding off of Washington, Oregon, and northern California
are suspected to also make this southward migration, but the provenance
of wintering birds in California has not been quantified. Birds
nesting in southern and central California may remain in the same
region throughout the year or they may disperse for the winter.
During the winter (December to March), most (50-95%) Rhinoceros
Auklets in California are located south of Bodega.7
Numbers in California decline rapidly in the spring as most individuals
return to breeding colonies to the north.
|
| MBNMS: |
Locally breeding
birds may arrive at breeding colonies in California as early as
January to begin preparations for breeding, but most of the population
arrives by March. During the breeding season, this species is concentrated
near breeding colonies in waters over the continental shelf and
at the shelf break (Figure 3). Post-breeding dispersal results in
a general shift seaward to waters beyond the shelf. However, large
concentrations can occur in areas where submarine canyons are found
close to shore, such as Monterey Bay.7
It is not known what portion of the birds that breed at central
California nesting colonies remain in the region during the winter.
Beginning in mid-October there is an influx of birds into Sanctuary
waters from breeding colonies to the north (Figure 3). The migrant
population remains in the Sanctuary through March.8
The source of migrants into the Sanctuary is not well understood.
Several Rhinoceros Auklets banded in B.C. have been recovered in
California.9,10
In addition, auklets banded on Southeast Farallon Island have been
observed breeding on Año Nuevo Island.5
|
|
[ Top of page ]
| Abundance |
| General: |
The world population
has been estimated between 1.0 - 1.25 million breeding birds.11
However, these estimates are very rough because of the difficulty
of censusing nocturnal, cavity-nesting birds. Most of the North
American population breeds on islands in southeastern Alaska (12%),
British Columbia (73%) and Washington (13%) and winters off California.11
Briggs and colleagues (1987) estimated the winter population in
California contained 100,000-300,000 and 200,000-300,000 to the
south and north of Point Conception, respectively.
Rhinoceros Auklets were once plentiful in California during the
breeding season, but all the breeding birds were extirpated by 1860.12
Breeding colonies were re-established in the 1970s at Castle Rock
National Wildlife Refuge (NWR) and the Farallon Islands.13
Since then, this species has steadily increased in abundance and
established nesting colonies on other Islands and a few mainland
sites. In 1989-1991, Carter and colleagues (1992) surveyed 30 nesting
sites in California and estimated the breeding population to be
approximately 1,800 birds. The majority of the breeding population
nested at three main colonies: Castle Rock NWR (1005 breeders);
South Farallon Islands (515 breeders); and Año Nuevo Island
(66).
The rapid increase in the size of the breeding colonies in the
first decade after their colonization suggests that both internal
recruitment and immigration were important factors.9
The nesting population at Southeast Farallon Island was fairly stable
in the mid to late 1980s.1,9
Current estimates of the breeding population size are not available.10
The nesting colony at Año Nuevo has shown a general increasing
trend since its colonization in the mid-1980s (see below for more
information).14
The status of the breeding population at Castle Rock NWR is not
known because it has not been censused since 1991.15
|
| MBNMS: |
Rhinoceros Auklets are more
abundant in the MBNMS during the non-breeding season (mean density
of 161 birds/100km2) than the breeding season (mean densities
of 48-62 birds/100 km2) due to the influx of post-breeding
migrants (Figure 3).6
Rhinoceros Auklets can reach very high densities (into the thousands)
in Monterey Bay during the winter.
The abundance of breeders in the MBNMS has increased significantly
since the early 1970s when re-colonization began. Rhinoceros Auklets
were first seen carrying fish near the current colony at Año
Nuevo Island in 1982, but breeding was not confirmed until 1986.
At that time, the number of breeding birds was determined to be
approximately 20.16
The population has since grown to a record high of 270 breeding
birds in 2003 (Figure 4).17
The addition of nest boxes has helped to increase the number of
nests and overall productivity of the breeding colony at Año
Nuevo Island.5
Chicks banded in nest boxes have been returning to Año Nuevo
Island to breed since 1997 indicating that some of the population
growth is due to internal recruitment.17
|

Figure 4. Population dynamics of Rhinoceros Auklets on Año
Nuevo Island over 21 years, 1982-2003.17
Download full-size
figures (192 KB PDF). |
|
[ Top of page ]
| Natural History |
| Click here to view the natural history information of this species. |
|
| Threats |
| General: |
Oil pollution:
The offshore foraging habits of this species bring it in close proximity
to commercial shipping channels in central and southern California.
A large oil or chemical spill from one of these ships could have
disastrous effects on local breeding populations as well as harm
migrants from breeding colonies to the north. The Apex Houston oil
spill in 1986 killed approximately 1,293 Rhinoceros Auklets in the
Sanctuary.21
The SS Jacob Luckenbach, a vessel that sank in 1953 in the Gulf
of the Farallones, has been sporadically leaking oil and, despite
a major clean-up effort, still poses an on-going threat to Rhinoceros
Auklets in central California. Leaks are known to have occurred
in 1997/98 (also called the Point Reyes Tarball Incidents) and 2001/02,
and others may have occurred in past years.22
Though only 37 Rhinoceros Auklets were collected between 1997 and
2003, it is estimated that a total of 593 Rhinoceros Auklets were
killed by oil spills associated with the SS Jacob Luckenbach during
this time period.23
Chemical pollution: Contaminants such as heavy
metals and organochlorines are a concern.24,25
Disturbance: Adults will readily desert their
nests if disturbed during the incubation or brooding periods. Adults
and chicks in shallow nesting burrows are vulnerable to trampling
by humans, pinnipeds, and surface nesting or roosting birds (e.g.,
cormorants, pelicans, geese).14
Habitat degradation: Native vegetation has been
lost on Año Nuevo Island leading to soil erosion; the number
of burrows damaged by erosion increased from 11% in 1997 to 56%
in 2001.14,26
The breeding habitat is rapidly disappearing due to extensive habitat
alterations during the lighthouse era, natural erosion, and sporadically
high California sea lion densities. In recent years, vegetation
loss and erosion at Castle Rock NWR has been caused by thousands
of roosting Aleutian Canada geese.14
Native predators: Predators, such as Peregrine
Falcons and Barn Owls, take Rhinoceros Auklets on Southeast Farallon
and Año Nuevo Islands. Observed predation at Año Nuevo
Island has ranged from 1-10% of the population each year since 1993.17
In British Columbia, increased populations of racoons on nesting
islands has become a concern.27
Exotic mammalian species: Extirpation of this
species from nesting colonies during the 1800s may have been caused
or exacerbated by the introduction of competitors for nesting sites
(e.g., the European hare) and predators (e.g., cats, rats).14
Exotic mammals have been removed from nesting islands, but re-introduction
could have devastating effects on nesting colonies.
Environmental variability (e.g., climate change,
El Niño): Delayed or reduced reproductive effort at the Farallon
Islands in 1992-93 and at both the Farallones and Año Nuevo
in 1998 was probably tied to the large El Niño events in
those years.5,16,28
Inter-decadal changes in ocean climate may also impact prey availability
and, consequently, reproductive effort.
Competition for prey species: Juvenile rockfish,
Northern anchovy, Pacific sardine, and market squid are commercially
harvested species and the preferred prey items of numerous marine
predators (e.g., brown pelicans, humpback whales). Strong competition
for limited prey resources may result in decreases in prey availability
and, subsequently, reduced reproductive rates in Rhinoceros Auklets.
Fisheries disturbance: The use of bright floodlights
by commercial squid fishing boats near nesting colonies may disrupt
courtship and breeding activities and may facilitate predation or
kleptoparasitism by nocturnal predators (e.g., barn owls, western
gulls).17
Nocturnal seabirds often are attracted to lights and some birds
may be injured or killed during collisions with lighted boats. |
| MBNMS: |
Loss of breeding
habitat on Año Nuevo Island: The Rhinoceros Auklet
colony on Año Nuevo Island is threatened by rapid erosion
of burrowing habitat and habitat destruction from California sea
lions that haul out in large concentrations in the non-breeding
season. It is estimated that the main colony, approximately 300
breeding birds, will disappear in less than 20 years if the soil
habitat is not stabilized and protected.27
No other predator-free habitat exists that is large enough to support
the Rhinoceros Auklet colony on Año Nuevo Island if current
burrowing habitat disappears.
|
|
[ Top of page ]
| Conservation and Research |
| Federal |
| General: |
The Rhinoceros Auklet
is not listed under the Endangered Species Act. This species is
protected in the U.S., Canada, and Mexico by the Federal Migratory
Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) of 1918, which prohibits pursuing, hunting,
shooting, wounding, killing, trapping, capturing, or collecting
any migratory bird, nest, or eggs without a permit from the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service. The MBTA does not protect nesting habitat.
On Jan 11, 2000, President Clinton established by proclamation
the California Coastal National Monument (CCNM). The CCNM encompasses
all unappropriated or unreserved islands, rocks, exposed reefs,
and pinnacles above mean high tide within 12 nm of the shoreline
of the State of California (it does not include major islands such
as the Channel Islands, the Farallon Islands, or the islands of
San Francisco Bay). The purpose of the CCNM is to protect these
geological structures as habitat for marine plants and animals,
such as the Rhinoceros Auklet. Appropriation, injury, destruction,
or removal any feature of the monument and settlement upon any of
the lands in the monument are prohibited. The Bureau of Land Management,
in cooperation with the California Department of Parks and Recreation
and the California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG), manages the
CCNM.
|
| MBNMS: |
Beach
COMBERS – Coastal Ocean Mammal and Bird Education and
Research Surveys (Project Leader: Hannah Nevins, Moss Landing Marine
Laboratories). In 1997 the MBNMS began a beach survey program using
trained volunteers to survey beached marine birds and mammals monthly
at selected sections of beaches throughout the Monterey Bay area.
Currently, the program monitors 45 km of beaches in the MBNMS. The
program is a collaborative project between MLML, MBNMS, and other
state and research institutions, with the specific goal of using
deposition of beach cast carcasses as an index of the health of
the sanctuary. This program obtains information on the rates of
stranding for all species. In addition, mortality events are detected,
causes of mortality events are assessed, and oil and tar deposition
is monitored. Data from this monitoring program assist the MBNMS
in the early detection of mortality events triggered by natural
and anthropogenic environmental perturbations such as red tides
and oil spills.
|
| State |
| General: |
The Rhinoceros Auklet is not
listed under the California Endangered Species Act (CESA). State
agencies are involved in the following projects that help to inform
management and conservation of Rhinoceros Auklets (see “Other”
section below of a description of collaborative projects involving
state agencies).
Marine Bird and Mammal Aerial Surveys (Principal Investigator:
Breck Tyler, CDFG-Office of Spill Prevention and Response). Since
the mid-1990s, data on the distribution and abundance of marine
mammals and seabirds in coastal waters have been collected monthly
via low-level aerial surveys. The area surveyed extends from the
surfline to the continental shelf and stretches from Big Sur to
Half Moon Bay. Though Rhinoceros Auklets occur frequently in waters
beyond the continental shelf break, these surveys monitor the distribution
of this species in coastal waters, such as around the breeding colony
at Año Nuevo Island. The CDFG-Office of Spill Prevention
and Response sponsor this on-going project. Collaborators: U.C.
Santa Cruz.
|
| Other |
| General: |
Año
Nuevo Island Seabird Population Biology and Feeding Ecology
(Principal Investigators: Julie Thayer and William Sydeman, PRBO
Conservation Science). This project began in 1992. One objective
of this study is to promote growth of the Año Nuevo Island
Rhinoceros Auklet population through (i) construction of boardwalks
to reduce trampling of burrows, (ii) installation of nest boxes
to supplement breeding habitat, provide protected nest sites,
and
aid in research and management efforts, and (iii) study the breeding
biology, feeding ecology, and population trends to understand
factors
affecting auklet population dynamics. Partners: Año Nuevo
State Reserve (California Department of Parks and Recreation),
Monterey
Bay National Marine Sanctuary, Oikonos, and University of California
Santa Cruz.
Restoration of Native Vegetation and Seabird Nesting Habitat on
Año Nuevo Island (Project Leaders: Michelle Hester, Oikonos
and Julie Thayer, PRBO Conservation Science). This project began
in 2001. The goals of this restoration project are to: 1) improve
soil stability and increase habitat diversity; 2) decrease the rate
of nesting burrow collapse; 3) increase the number of birds occupying
natural nest sites; and 4) restore natural processes and long-term
conservation of biodiversity. Collaboration and funding: California
State Coastal Conservancy, Año Nuevo State Reserve, Go Native,
and University of California Natural Reserve System. This work is
conducted under direction and permits from the State of California
Department of Parks and Recreation.
Seabird Breeding Biology on the Farallon Islands (Principal Investigators:
Russ Bradley and Peter Warzybok, PRBO Conservation Science). This
project began in 1971. The objective of this study is to study the
breeding biology, feeding ecology, and population dynamics of a
seabird community in relation to naturally occurring and human-induced
climate change. The Rhinoceros Auklet is one of the focal species
of this study. Currently, study plots are monitored annually for
occupancy and productivity rates.10
Partners: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
CIMT
- Center for Integrated Marine Technologies: Wind to Whales.
The Monterey Bay - from Pt. Año Nuevo to Pt. Lobos and
out to 122°05' west longitude - is the focal region of the
Wind to Whales Program. This project is an interdisciplinary
collaborative
research project involving scientists and engineers from UCSC,
NMFS, Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute, Moss Landing
Marine Labs,
MBNMS, and Naval Postgraduate School. CIMT uses data collected
via remote sensing, moorings and ship-board surveys to investigate
linkages
between: coastal upwelling, nutrient delivery, spatial and temporal
variability in phytoplankton, and the distribution and abundance
of organisms at higher trophic levels including squid, fishes,
seabirds, sea turtles, pinnipeds, and whales. Currently, CIMT
records the
location and abundance of Rhinoceros Auklets observed during monthly
ship-board surveys in the Monterey Bay.
|
|
[ Top of page ]
| Research Gaps |
| MBNMS: |
On-going monitoring
programs are gathering data on the status of the two largest breeding
colonies in central California and this species coastal distribution
in the central portion of the MNBMS. Additional research is needed
in the following areas:
- Identify all other nesting colonies in California, particularly
those in the Sanctuary, and monitor population trends, reproductive
effort, and sources of mortality at these locations. Develop species-
and habitat-specific burrow size guidelines and occupancy correction
factors to improve extremely rough, out-dated, or non-existent
breeding population estimates and standardize population surveys.
All colonies in California should be monitored in the same year
to allow estimation of the state-wide and Sanctuary-wide breeding
population. Identify nesting colonies that are experiencing threats
from habitat degradation and increased predation. Prioritize actions
to protect and/or restore these colonies.
- Monitoring the status of prey stocks and fishing activities
near colonies would help to define the relationship between Rhinoceros
Auklets, forage fish resources, and commercial fisheries. This
information could be used to evaluate possible impacts and guide
fisheries management.
- Sanctuary-wide at-sea winter surveys to determine the size of
the winter population and identify areas of high winter use.
- Use banding, satellite tracking, archival tags, and/or radar
tracking to monitoring daily, seasonal, and annual movement patterns
of birds nesting and wintering in Sanctuary waters. These data
would help determine the location of important foraging habitats,
the source of migrants into Sanctuary waters, and immigration
rates between nesting colonies.
- Use genetic data to determine the genetic structure of the population
and long-term immigration rates.
|
|
[ Top of page ]
| Recommended Actions |
| General: |
- Support the active management of fisheries that target the prey
species of the Rhinoceros Auklet, such as rockfish, anchovy, sardine,
and squid fisheries. The goal of management should be a balance
between human use and maintaining adequate prey resources for
this population.
- Review, update and help to implement all aspects of a vessel
traffic management system along the central and southern California
coasts to ensure the safe transport of petroleum and other hazardous
materials near Rhinoceros Auklet nesting and foraging habitat.
- Education outreach and resource management efforts to reduce
disturbance to nesting Rhinoceros Auklets on coastal islands and
mainland cliffs, such as light disturbance from squid fishing
vessels.29
|
| MBNMS: |
- Enforce Sanctuary regulations that help prevent disturbance
to Rhinoceros Auklets including:
- Prohibitions on discharging or depositing any material in
or near Sanctuary boundaries that injures a Sanctuary resource
(e.g., garbage, oil, abandoned fishing gear).30
- Prohibitions on take or injury to seabirds protected under
the MBTA.
- Help reduce on-going mortality from oiling by maintaining the
moratorium on offshore oil development in the MBNMS, reducing
chronic oil pollution from shipping traffic and sunken vessels,
and increasing response capability against oil spills. Model effects
of recent oil spills to estimate impacts to Rhinoceros Auklets,
which are seldom recovered, and model impacts of potential spills
to determine appropriate levels of rescue and restoration efforts.14
- Support efforts at Año Nuevo Island to protect the colony
from extirpation by both restoring native plants that stabilize
the soil and excluding California sea lions from destroying the
burrowing habitat. In addition, support efforts at other breeding
colonies in California to determine the current and future effects
of changes to nesting habitat.
- Continue efforts (e.g., BeachCOMBERS) to locate, identify, and
recover beach cast Rhinoceros Auklets and to identify the causes
of mortality.
|
|
[ Top of page ]
| Cited References |
| 1. Carter, HR, McChesney GJ, Jaques
DL, Strong CS, Parker MW, Takekawa JE, Jory DL, Whitworth DL (1992)
Breeding populations of seabirds in California, 1989-1991. Unpublished
Report of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Dixon, CA. |
| 2. Fix D, Beeler H, LeValley R (2002)
California Coastal National Monument: Literature Search and Summarization
of Key Biological Resources of the Monument - Seabirds and Marine
Mammals. Prepared for the Bureau of Land Management by Mad River Biologists,
McKinleyville, CA. |
| 3. McChesney GJ, Carter HR, Whitworth
DL (1995) Reoccupation and extension of southern breeding limits of
Tufted Puffins and Rhinoceros Auklets in California. Colonial Waterbirds
18:79-90. |
| 4. Sowls, AL, DeGange AR, Nelson JW,
Lester GS (1980) Catalog of California seabird colonies. U.S. Dept.
Interior, Fish & Wildlife Serv., Biol. Serv. Program. FWS/OBS
37/80. |
| 5. Thayer JA, Hester MM, Sydeman WJ
(2000) Conservation biology of Rhinoceros Auklets, Cerorhinca
monocerata, on Año Nuevo Island, California, 1993-1999.
Endangered Species Update 17: 62-67. |
| 6. NOAA National Centers for Coastal
Ocean Science (NCCOS) (2003) A Biogeographic Assessment of North/Central
California: To Support the Joint Management Plan Review for Cordell
Bank, Gulf of the Farallones, And Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuaries;
Phase I - Marine Fishes, Birds and Mammals. Prepared by NCCOS's Biogeography
Team in Cooperation with the National Marine Sanctuary Program, Silver
Spring, MD. http://biogeo.nos.noaa.gov/products/canms_cd/ |
| 7. Briggs KT, Tyler WMB,
Lewis DB, Carlson DR (1987) Bird communities at sea off California:
1975 to 1983. In: Pitelka FA (ed) Studies in Avian Biology No 11.
Cooper Ornithological Society, Los Angeles, p 74. |
| 8. Roberson D (2002) Monterey
Birds. Monterey Peninsula Audubon Society, Carmel, CA. |
| 9. Ainley DG, Morrell SH, Boekelheide
RJ (1990) Rhinoceros Auklet and tufted puffin. In: Ainley DG, Boekelheide
RJ (eds) Seabirds of the Farallon Islands: Ecology, Dynamics, and
Structure of an Upwelling-System Community. Stanford University Press,
Stanford, CA, p 339-348. |
| 10. Julie Thayer, PRBO Conservation
Science, personal communication |
| 11. Gaston AJ, Dechesne SBC (1996) Rhinoceros
Auklet (Cerorhinca monocerata). In: The Birds of North America,
No. 212 (A. Poole and F. Gill, eds.). The Academy of Natural Sciences,
Philadelphia, PA, and The American Ornithologists' Union, Washington,
D.C. |
| 12. Grinnell, J (1926) The
evidence of the former breeding of the Rhinoceros Auklet in California.
Condor 28: 37-40. |
| 13. Ainley DG, Lewis TJ (1974) The
history of Farallon Island marine bird populations 1854-1972. Condor
76: 432-446. |
| 14. Thayer JA, Mills K. The Status of
Rhinoceros Auklet (Cerorhinca monocerata) in California.
Marine Ecology Division, PRBO Conservation Science. http://www.prbo.org/cms/static/RHAU_status.php |
| 15. Deborah Jaques, Jaques Biological
Consulting, personal communication |
| 16. Hester, MM (1998) Abundance,
reproduction and prey of Rhinoceros Auklet, Cerorhinca monocerata,
on Año Nuevo Island, California. M.S. Thesis, Moss Landing
Marine Laboratories and San Francisco State University. |
| 17. Thayer JA, Sydeman WJ
(2004) Long-term Studies of Seabirds on Año Nuevo Island and
Mainland, 2003. Final Report to the Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary,
Sanctuary Integrated Monitoring Network (SIMoN). http://www.mbnms-simon.org/docs/project/100251_report.pdf |
| 18. Gaston AJ, Jones IL
(1998) The Auks. Oxford University Press, Oxford. |
| 19. Gardner DA, Thayer JA,
Sydeman WJ (in press) Site fidelity in Rhinoceros Auklets (Cerorhinca
monocerata): temporal and spatial variability in mate and success
effects. Auk. |
| 20. Julie Thayer, PRBO
Conservation Science, unpublished data |
| 21. Carter HR, Lee VA, Page
GW, Parker MW, Ford RG, Swartzman G, Kress SW, Siskin BR, Singer SW,
Fry DM (2003) The 1986 Apex Houston oil spill in central California:
seabird injury assessments and litigation process. Marine Ornithology
31:9-19. http://www.marineornithology.org/PDF/31_1/31_1_2_carter.pdf |
| 22. Roletto J, Mortenson
J, Harrald I, Hall J, Grella L (2003) Beached bird surveys and chronic
oil pollution in Central California. Marine Ornithology 31:21-28.
http://www.farallones.org/research_page/31_1_3_roletto.pdf |
| 23. Luckenbach Trustee Council
(2006) S.S. Jacob Luckenbach and Associated Mystery Oil Spills Final
Damage Assessment and Restoration Plan/Environmental Assessment.,
Prepared by California Department of Fish and Game, National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration, United States Fish and Wildlife Service,
National Park Service. http://www.dfg.ca.gov/ospr/organizational/scientific/nrda/luckenbach_final_darp.pdf
|
| 24. Jarman WM, Hobson KA,
Sydeman WJ, Bacon CE, McLaren EB (1996) Influence of trophic position
and feeding location on contaminant levels in the Gulf of the Farallones
food web revealed by stable isotope analysis. Environmental Science
& Technology 30:654-660. |
| 25. Sydeman WJ, Jarman
WM (1998) Trace metals in seabirds, Steller sea lion, and forage
fish
and zooplankton from central California. Marine Pollution Bulletin
36:828-832. |
| 26. Oikonos website, http://www.oikonos.org/projects/ano.htm |
| 27. Michelle Hester, Oikonos,
personal communication |
| 28. PRBO, unpublished data |
| 29. Addressed in part by
JMPR Wildlife Disturbance Issues - Marine Mammal, Seabird and Turtle
Disturbance Action Plan: Commercial Harvest Related Disturbance Strategy.
Joint
Management Plan Review (JMPR). Proposed Action Plans. Draft report.
Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary. http://sanctuaries.noaa.gov/jointplan/drafts/mb_mp.html |
| 30. Addressed in part by
JMPR Wildlife Disturbance Issues - Marine Mammal, Seabird and Turtle
Disturbance Action Plan: Marine Debris Strategy. Joint
Management Plan Review (JMPR). Proposed Action Plans. Draft report.
Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary. http://sanctuaries.noaa.gov/jointplan/drafts/mb_mp.html |
|
| References and Resources |
| Click here for images, reports, and links to other websites for this species. |
|
| Acknowledgement of Reviewers |
Thank
you to Julie Thayer and Michelle Hester for reviewing this report
and providing helpful comments and corrections. |
|
Content Last Modified: 12/2006
|